Laura Samson vs Natalija Senic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Oct at 07:42 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Samson vs N. Senic

CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SRB
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Samson 1 - 0 Senic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Laura Samson winning 2 and Natalija Senic winning 0. The last match between Laura Samson and Natalija Senic was at the W50 Heraklion, 09-10-2025, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Laura Samson getting the victory 6-0 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Samson | 1 |
| Senic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R3) W50 Heraklion(10-09-25)
L. Samson vs N. Senic H2H Profile
L. Samson vs N. Senic Match Preview:
- In recent months, Laura Samson has won 35.78% of her points on the second serve whereas Natalija Senic has achieved 34.44%. Who has the edge? Slightly, it is Laura Samson.
- When it comes to returning second serves, Laura has outshone Natalija by taking 54.25% of her opponent's second serve points compared to Natalija's 49.46%.
- The return stats on first serves also favor Laura, with her securing 35.40% compared to Natalija’s 31.50%.
- Under pressure, Laura also has an advantage, saving 47.62% of breakpoints compared to Natalija's 37.08%.
- Looking at match win percentages over the last year, Natalija has a higher rate of 72.41% whereas Laura holds a 64.71% success rate.
- Both players excel on Clay with a win percentage of 70%, but struggle on other surfaces; Laura is less comfortable on I.hard, and Natalija on Hard courts.
- At challenger/ITF level tournaments > $10K, Laura has a slightly better win rate of 68.75% compared to Natalija's 61.29%.
- The quality of opponents faced is telling; Laura has competed against higher-ranked players, with an average rank of 342.31 compared to Natalija's 397.62.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Natalija edges Laura by winning 50% of deciding sets versus Laura's 43%.
Editorial Prediction (October 9, 2025, UTC):
Based on the recent performance trends, Laura Samson has a slight upper hand in second serve points both won and returned, which is often a key differentiator in closely matched competitions.
However, Natalija Senic has demonstrated a stronger overall win percentage in the past year, showing her capability to close out matches successfully.
While Laura has faced tougher competition historically, Natalija's ability to push through deciding sets could be pivotal if the match goes the distance.
Considering the strengths and weaknesses of both players, Laura Samson’s return game and ability to face higher-ranked opponents give her a slight edge. Therefore, Laura Samson is the likely winner in this upcoming match.
Laura Samson vs Natalija Senic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Samson vs N. Senic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:34:59 | Average Match Time | 1:34:59 |
| 62% (42/68) | 1st Serve % | 59% (29/49) |
| 69% (29/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (16/29) |
| 42% (11/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (5/20) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 17% (1/6) |
| 57% (28/49) | Return Points Win % | 41% (28/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Samson Recent Matches Played
N. Senic Recent Matches Played

L. Samson vs N. Senic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.23% (63/28) | YTD Win/Loss | 72.33% (183/70) |
| 65.24% (137/73) | Sets Win/Loss | 70.72% (384/159) |
| 56.99% (1035/781) | Games Win/Loss | 60.66% (2792/1811) |
| 70.00% (21/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 71.93% (41/16) | Clay Win/Loss | 73.44% (177/64) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.55% (6/5) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 79 | Aces Total | 259 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 333 | Total Double Faults | 417 |
| 1:35:57 | Average Match Time | 1:23:22 |
| 389.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 434.41 |
| 62% (3409/5494) | 1st Serve % | 60% (7546/12537) |
| 62% (2122/3409) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (4693/7546) |
| 44% (917/2085) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2457/4991) |
| 52% (458/878) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 56% (1071/1925) |
| 52% (2912/5654) | Return Points Win % | 52% (6679/12781) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (1/0) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63.79% (37/21) | Challenger W/L | 62.32% (43/26) |
| 88.46% (23/3) | Futures W/L | 75.96% (139/44) |
| 70% (62/89) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 73% (180/247) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 36% (4/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (20/34) |
| 62% (16/26) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (21/41) |
| 86% (59/51) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (184/172) |
| 14% (59/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (184/12) |
| 38% (32/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (69/11) |